This is the website of Abulsme Noibatno Itramne (also known as Sam Minter). Posts here are rare these days. For current stuff, follow me on Mastodon

Categories

Calendar

November 2024
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-25 (UTC)

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-24 (UTC)

  • 03:15:47 Retweeted @owillis 03:15:14 Obviously impeaching a president without a Senate conviction is a political disaster1998 GOP impeaches Clinton
    1998 midterms GOP loses seats, retains control of House
    2000 Bush “wins”
    2002 midterms GOP takes Senate
    2002-2007 complete GOP control of government
  • 15:15:07 Listening to The Scott Horton Show from The Libertarian Institute 4/19/19 Max Blumenthal on Assange, Manning, and Venezuela https://t.co/HdPShpmYo6
  • 17:29:07 Retweeted @ThePlumLineGS 14:24:16 Trump may be strengthening the case for his own impeachment.If WH keeps stonewalling, legal case of House Dems may be *strengthened* by impeachment inquiry, legal experts tell me.

    This forces Dems to choose: Impeachment, or neuter themselves.

    My piece: https://t.co/dVrMIUdMG6

  • 20:00:31 Retweeted @scottwongDC 19:44:32 Deutsche Bank begins process of providing Trump financial records to New York’s attorney general https://t.co/nlK0BogKCB
  • 21:39:59 Retweeted @gtconway3d 21:06:01 “Obviously, this is personal for me, and some may say that I’m not the right messenger.”Perhaps so. Probably so. But if she’s with the Constitution, I’m with her. https://t.co/aAV02H7c0o
  • 22:07:16 It may not be all of it, but so much trouble seems to come from using one umbrella term to cover so much. And some of the push to lump everything into one bucket seems to come from how our health care systems link definitions and official diagnoses into access to services. https://t.co/esCi3IHYQe
  • 22:26:19 Retweeted @CarrollDoherty 20:43:43 This graphic – in a 2014 piece by the late Andy Kohut – tells you everything you need to know about public views of Richard Nixon and impeachment in 1973-74.
    https://t.co/s86cQ2mKoY https://t.co/w3T9lyQcpQ
  • 22:35:59 Retweeted @nwarikoo 22:27:44 “Stabbing a defenseless teenage captive to death. Picking off a school-age girl and an old man from a sniper’s roost. Indiscriminately spraying neighborhoods with rockets and machine-gun fire…highly decorated platoon chief commit shocking acts in Iraq.” https://t.co/5dVRXx6Apy

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-23 (UTC)

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-22 (UTC)

  • 00:43:19 Retweeted @RadioFreeTom 2019-04-21 22:53:53 Volume 1 is a nightmare, and I’m so engrossed in it that I barely looked at Volume 2. The shills trying to wave this away are despicable. Especially those who know better – which is most of them. Beneath contempt. https://t.co/2FwEaOMV1y
  • 03:15:22 Reading -> What House Democrats should do now – The Washington Post https://t.co/op5yJpT9yH
  • 04:04:27 Retweeted @natsecHeather 01:24:17 Should I tell her about how quickly this turns into innocent exchanges of the new obscene words the kids just heard? https://t.co/0fvZMdcsgL
  • 04:09:06 Retweeted @SallyAlbright 00:58:04 I called it.Bernie ran the exact same scam that lost Jim Wright his Speakership and cost Newt Gingrich $400k in fines, but from campaign donations, not from lobbyists.

    And sadly, it’s legal. Unethical af, but legal. https://t.co/qbqgEjBQcR

  • 05:37:27 Retweeted @RonaldKlain 02:46:35 I really feel like Dems are making the “impeachment question” complicated, when it’s simple:
    “We will hold hearings on what Trump did wrong–including things Mueller didn’t even consider (like corruption). At the end of the hearings, we will decide what punishment we support.”
  • 15:46:46 Retweeted @MikeDrucker 12:23:31 ELIZABETH WARREN: “…and that is why I’ve created a sustainable plant-based fuel that will allow is to colonize Mars and prevent any future wars over-”*media bursts in*

    MEDIA: “Hey everyone! Quick! There’s a dog on a skateboard running for President!”

    *everyone runs out*

  • 18:20:56 Mayor Pete now solidly in 3rd in both IA & NH in the RCP avgs.IA: Biden 24% Sanders 20% Buttigieg 11% Harris 8% Warren 7%

    NH: Sanders 23% Biden 21% Buttigieg 13% Warren 7% Harris 6%

    National: Biden 30% Sanders 23% O’Rourke 9% Harris 9% Buttigieg 6%

    https://t.co/R0ZRVjDLX1

  • 18:55:20 Sigh. https://t.co/C0CJO2lRpy
  • 19:04:57 Retweeted @smotus 18:58:42 A lot of folks frame impeachment as something that would cost Democrats votes in 2020. I have a piece up at @pacificstand addressing this and other issues related to impeachment. (1/4)
    https://t.co/wP1fbcQIhD
  • 19:28:53 Retweeted @Ibishblog 19:09:42 EXCELLENT and really quite moving from вЃ¦@MaxBootвЃ© – it’s painful enough to watch this tragedy unfolding without many of the supporting cast of villains and scoundrels being one’s own former associates. He has my sympathies and my thanks. https://t.co/v95RuVWTGO
  • 20:46:35 Retweeted @vermontgmg 20:15:15 THREAD: Assuming you didn’t spend the whole weekend reading the Mueller Report (but you really should!), I broke down for @WIRED 14 overlooked takeaways hidden in its 448 pages….: https://t.co/UoAecw4lNf
  • 23:05:39 Retweeted @ezralevin 15:08:27 The most “radical” impeachment position in Congress right now is that a committee should consider whether the House should consider whether a discussion should take place in the Senate to consider whether Trump should be removed from office for crimes he clearly committed.

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-21 (UTC)

  • 01:07:32 This is very true. Dems are by no means unified about the necessity of this approach. They would need almost everybody to proceed. https://t.co/rQZLydHRkz
  • 02:59:58 Retweeted @JWVerret 2019-04-20 19:55:08 Finished a second read through the Mueller Report. I don’t say this lightly, as a life long Republican, former R Hill staffer, and someone who has worked on every R campaign and pre-transition team for the last ten years. There is enough here to begin impeachment proceedings.
  • 03:09:59 @BYUfan Sigh. OK. i will check it out when I get a chance. in reply to BYUfan
  • 05:22:29 Retweeted @DavidKlion 2019-04-20 13:17:12 This is Beltway Brain. A totally pervasive, consuming cynicism. Oh, you thought we had rule of law? Actually, we have gamed out political scenarios and a blasГ© attitude toward right and wrong. People read takes like this and come away feeling despair. DC elites thrive on despair. https://t.co/2rRz8WqIK0
  • 05:55:22 Retweeted @GlennF 05:36:58 I don’t know if I’d ever be as confident as Don Jr., who has spent days trumpeting the fact Mueller found him too ignorant to crime, but clever enough to try to traitor.
  • 05:57:42 Retweeted @NicolleDWallace 2019-04-19 23:48:55 Making my way through the Mueller Report more carefully and every incident of premeditated and strategic lying to the press as KT McFarland does with @IgnatiusPost makes me think we still haven’t adequately adjusted to the asymmetrical task of covering bald faced liars.
  • 05:59:43 Retweeted @NormOrnstein 05:29:21 It is a continuation of asymmetric polarization and the “both sides” imperative of most reporters. https://t.co/1BnFzoLpZa
  • 19:52:09 Retweeted @soledadobrien 19:50:10 Hi, person who writes (and is paid for by) the @nytimes: the President was not exonerated.Yeesh. https://t.co/sdPlt2PxPx
  • 20:24:28 Nails it. https://t.co/P2n5dE39OH
  • 20:26:57 Excellent summary -> What Mueller Found on Russia and on Obstruction: A First Analysis – Lawfare https://t.co/NiFhMk19Qa
  • 20:32:01 Retweeted @juliettekayyem 12:10:57 Even with redactions, Volume 1 is such a mind boggling display of soulless corruption it still blows my mind on 2nd read.
    V2 has the capacity to distract us from the treachery in V1. Don’t let it. V2 is about POTUS protected from criminal liability. V1 provides moral clarity.
  • 20:32:05 Retweeted @tribelaw 20:26:31 I agree with @juliettekayyem here. Everyone talks about how Vol 2 gives Congress a roadmap for impeachment proceedings. It does for sure. But it’s Vol 1 that shows why those proceedings are morally and constitutionally imperative — as well as what they should showcase on tv. https://t.co/FZufgx1hM3

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-20 (UTC)

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-19 (UTC)

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-18 (UTC)

  • 00:07:11 Retweeted @davepell 00:06:05 Please remember that Trump fired Sessions and hired Barr specifically, and solely, because he was angry that Sessions wasn’t obstructing.
  • 00:14:26 I wonder if it will be possible to find a link to the report on Twitter once it is posted. I’m worried it will be difficult to find.
  • 03:17:10 Retweeted @CarolLeonnig 00:48:49 BREAKING — Get ready to see a LOT of Mueller report. We’re told it will be lightly redacted, revealing a “granular” look at possible obstruction of justice evidence debated in probe of @realDonaldTrump
    https://t.co/Y7dUZwmdS4
  • 03:43:32 Oops https://t.co/h3RSitoOtB
  • 05:09:48 Retweeted @jaredbkeller 2019-04-17 23:59:30 [INT. A diner in Iowa]ME: How is your last name pronounced?

    PETE BUTTIGIEG: It’s ‘Boot-EDGE-EDGE,’ not ‘Booty-JUDGE’

    ME: Huh, right. I guess I’ll …

    (•_•)

    ( •_•)>⌐■-■

    (вЊђв– _в– )

    … booty-JUDGE of that!

    PETE BUTTIGIEG:

    ME:

    PETE BUTTIGIEG:

    ME: I’m president now

  • 05:18:11 Retweeted @PreetBharara 2019-04-17 22:18:26 I’m preparing my own counter report. It will be comprised of many sections, each less than 280 characters.
  • 13:03:02 Just to get this on the record, here are the Mueller report predictions I made on the Curmudgeon’s Corner Slack yesterday… (1/5)
  • 13:03:03 I’m going to go with about 30% redacted, most of that color coded as “related to continuing investigations”. The stuff that is not redacted will be embarrassing details, but about general events we already knew about. (2/5) in reply to abulsme
  • 13:03:03 No brand new big bombshells. Everything will still be consistent with the “useful idiots” theory of what happened on the collusion side. (3/5) in reply to abulsme
  • 13:03:04 On the obstruction side we’ll see a run down of the kinds of things we already know about, and folks who always thought it was obstruction will still think so, but it won’t convince anybody who wasn’t already there. (4/5) in reply to abulsme
  • 13:03:04 Alternately it will be really fun if we get hard evidence that Trump and family really were innocent, and this whole thing was the Russians framing Trump to encourage divisions in American society. Which is plausible. (Although still falls into the “useful idiot” zone.) (5/5) in reply to abulsme
  • 13:14:24 Retweeted @mattsgorman 01:31:58 Breaking: The Mueller Report CD-ROM will also contain 12 free hours of America Online
  • 13:27:09 I got up before 6 am for this stupid thing. Barr better be on time and not do one of these things where he keeps people waiting. :-/
  • 14:14:05 So, interesting news conference. But mostly ignorable. We’ll see what we see later today. Most interesting thing to me was that Barr is going to give a less redacted copy to congressional leaders… but still without the 6e info, which he doesn’t want to file a court motion about.
  • 15:07:07 Time to start reading I guess… https://t.co/mOHqiFc3zg
  • 15:32:20 Started reading, but now have to get my son to school and then go to work. Reduced to listening to other people reading and talking about it on my headphones while I do other things…
  • 16:34:03 Retweeted @ChrisWarcraft 16:26:46 So basically the redacted report is “Trump was too dumb to commit these crimes properly but REALLY wanted to commit crimes which by the way is still an impeachable offense” and they’re trying to spin that as a win?
  • 16:39:30 Retweeted @jbview 16:21:46 The Watergate-era Congress considered that kind of lies to the public to be part of of a legitimate impeachment. https://t.co/RdKvJYpmIw
  • 16:44:09 Retweeted @OfficialJonZal 16:31:29 Because nothing says “TOTALLY EXONERATED!” quite like slumping back in your chair and announcing “Oh my God. … I’m fucked.” https://t.co/LZlWUn9QH4 in reply to OfficialJonZal
  • 16:51:39 Retweeted @BenjySarlin 16:29:46 There’s an alchemy going on by which bombshell Russia stories in the news get derided as fake news when they come out and then old news when they’re confirmed by a massive federal investigation
  • 16:52:04 Retweeted @BradMossEsq 15:49:47 .@DonaldJTrumpJr was spared a conspiracy charge because Mueller decided he was too stupid to know what he was doing was potentially illegal. https://t.co/qLA45D9aZj
  • 16:54:56 6% is a lot less than the 30% I expected. But I seem to have been right that most of the redactions are related to ongoing investigations. Which is interesting on its own. https://t.co/9eU0uyaRcq
  • 16:57:19 By the way, we aren’t recording the Curmudgeon’s Corner podcast until TOMMORROW night, so we’ll be able to respond to more fully digested responses to this report, rather than instant reactions as people are skimming and speed reading.
  • 17:48:46 Retweeted @ElieNYC 17:10:34 Jesus Christ. Only 10 pages into the obstruction section, but the contrast b/w it and the Russia section is striking.
    Russia Section: It all looks bad but criminal conspiracy is hard to prove.
    Obstruction section: This is easy to prove for anybody with the authority to do so.
  • 18:13:06 We win! https://t.co/EVQPsQuog0
  • 19:31:03 Retweeted @maxbergmann 18:35:00 The press need to stop saying there was no “evidence of collusion.” That’s Barr’s spin. The report is FULL of evidence of collusion. Mueller just said it didn’t legally amount to a criminal conspiracy.
  • 19:53:44 Retweeted @jonfavs 19:50:54 This is unbelievably disappointing. Even if you don’t ultimately pursue impeachment proceedings, why on Earth would you say this today?Part of the American people making a judgment in 2020 requires a full account of the President’s criminality and abuse of power. https://t.co/DB634jA2Fq
  • 21:10:22 Thread. https://t.co/eOByfbFm3K
  • 21:18:56 Retweeted @RadioFreeTom 21:09:22 I have been on the road all day, and I am just now reading up on today’s events, and I’ll just say:Every Trump shill who demanded an apology from the Trump-Russia folks owes the Trump-Russia folks a big goddamn apology.

    There was no crime. Fine. The rest of it is disgusting.

  • 22:14:56 Retweeted @normative 22:04:14 So, the full report reinforces my reaction to Barr’s summary: An inquiry focused on whether there was an “agreement”—a legal prerequisite for a conspiracy charge—definitionally omits the kind of public quid pro quo we all witnessed playing out.
  • 22:16:30 Retweeted @joshtpm 16:42:43 Seems worth noting. Red underline is part Barr quoted, blue underline the part he omitted. https://t.co/5UOC22ZsZk
  • 22:52:55 Retweeted @neal_katyal 21:27:49 This is a striking footnote. It’s raising seriously the possibility of criminal liability when Trump leaves office. Amazing. https://t.co/zSuMf1tL0f
  • 22:57:02 I agreed with this a year ago. I don’t any more. Even if it is doomed to fail, even if it is doomed politically, there is a moral imperative to push as hard as possible here to try to bring accountability. If the Senate tanks it, that is on them, so be it. Make them defend him. https://t.co/gzWUOKJ09M
  • 23:16:37 Nice! -> You can now download the source code for all Infocom text adventure classics | Ars Technica https://t.co/IoFUMpo1QH
  • 23:20:34 Retweeted @DaveMc99TA 23:02:36 So aggravating. Basically D leadership has endorsed the idea that the President didn’t do anything wrong and the voters don’t need to understand what he did so now any future President can do the same thing. https://t.co/CpqH8jQxUi
  • 23:24:11 Thread https://t.co/Bq6RhW0D0u
  • 23:26:06 Another thread. https://t.co/JEiMrILD2F
  • 23:50:16 Retweeted @samstein 14:17:59 The basic rationalization Barr gives for why Trump didn’t legally obstruct justice is that he was emotionally upset about being accused of potential crimes and bad media coverage and acted out. That’s the actual argument the Attorney General of the United States made.
  • 23:59:00 @lrozen I read maybe 20 pages before I had to go to work this morning. Heading home shortly. Intend to ignore other things I should do in order to read most of the night. But I am a news junky. Very few people will do this. Hell, I may not actually end up finishing. But I will try. in reply to lrozen

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-17 (UTC)

@abulsme tweets from 2019-04-16 (UTC)