- 00:22:44 Reading – Activists Urge Clinton Campaign to Challenge Election Results in 3 Swing States (Gabriel Sherman) https://t.co/CbGJpIjCVe
- 00:24:36 Retweeted @Nate_Cohn 2016-11-22 23:50:44 These guys might know about computer security, but they probably don't know anything about elections… https://t.co/S4e3zLquzc
- 00:24:41 Retweeted @Nate_Cohn 2016-11-22 23:51:07 Where are there paper ballots in Wisconsin? Milwaukee, Madison and the Milwaukee suburbs? in reply to Nate_Cohn
- 00:25:03 Retweeted @Nate_Cohn 2016-11-22 23:52:45 It's hard to stress how weak this is. https://t.co/H3xSvrHT8y
- 00:25:06 Retweeted @Nate_Cohn 00:16:25 Metro Wisconsin, where Clinton did well, uses paper; rural Wisc, where she collapsed like everywhere, is electronic. https://t.co/4aF9ooOnWe
- 00:25:10 Retweeted @Nate_Cohn 00:17:41 Look, maybe these researchers have a lot more than what's in the article. But there's a *very* easy explanation for the pattern in article in reply to Nate_Cohn
- 00:27:25 Retweeted @zeynep 00:13:52 @Nate_Cohn @jbarro I'm skeptical of claims but *if* the team includes Halderman, that's a different level. Serious, cautious top researcher. in reply to Nate_Cohn
- 00:27:31 Retweeted @Nate_Cohn 00:14:36 @zeynep @jbarro serious researchers who wade into an area that they know much about can end up saying stupid stuff in reply to zeynep
- 00:27:35 Retweeted @zeynep 00:16:42 @Nate_Cohn @jbarro Alex is among world's top experts in computer security and voting. Cautious person. His name there gives me pause. in reply to Nate_Cohn
- 00:48:57 Retweeted @owillis 00:39:19 The bar must be very high to claim an election was stolen. I saw left waste so much time and energy on this while Bush went nuts, pls don't
- 00:51:18 Retweeted @NateSilver538 00:28:22 To follow: some *very* quick analysis which suggests the claim here of rigged results in Wisconsin is probably BS: https://t.co/SYlE76bnmQ
- 00:51:20 Retweeted @NateSilver538 00:31:17 Run a regression on Wisc. counties with >=50K people, and you find that Clinton improved more in counties with only… https://t.co/upbXEuRtCM in reply to NateSilver538
- 00:51:22 Retweeted @NateSilver538 00:32:43 …the effect COMPLETELY DISAPPEARS once you control for race and education levels, the key factors in predicting v… https://t.co/72rn2d2Y92 in reply to NateSilver538
- 00:51:25 Retweeted @NateSilver538 00:36:54 Maybe a more complicated analysis would reveal something, but usually bad news when a finding can't survive a basic sanity check like this. in reply to NateSilver538
- 01:19:03 Retweeted @AndrewCouts 00:32:01 Heads up: Calling the DOJ to push them to audit state vote tallies doesn’t actually work: https://t.co/8Nmid1butI
- 01:20:09 Retweeted @ForecasterEnten 00:26:04 The Clinton campaign saw this evidence and seemingly decided to do nothing with it.
- 01:20:12 Retweeted @ForecasterEnten 00:57:46 So… 1. Paper ballot effect in WI doesn't hold up when controlling for education. 2. MI is all paper ballots. 3. PA margin is 65k votes.
- 01:20:15 Retweeted @ForecasterEnten 00:58:57 And the thing is that there are close elections where shady stuff can make a difference. This isn't one of those cases. Trump won.
- 01:20:19 Retweeted @ForecasterEnten 01:02:32 What's going on here is people so want to believe that Trump couldn't win that any bit of evidence of fraud they're hanging their hats on.
- 01:36:31 So, yeah… I know a bunch of folks want to believe there was fraud or something, but no. Grasping at straws. Nothing to see. Move along.
- 03:31:26 Retweeted @ZLabe 03:29:07 It's really kinda crazy that even though the temperature spike has sharply fallen, #Arctic temperatures remain sign… https://t.co/hIiN7cu0Cd
- 03:41:21 Retweeted @BrendanNyhan 03:19:38 Seriously considering whether this New York Magazine article was planted as a giant field experiment to document liberal motivated reasoning
- 03:51:05 Retweeted @Redistrict 03:17:32 Left-wing conspiracy theories of vote rigging in MI/PA/WI just as pathetic as Pat McCrory's refusal to accept defeat in NC.
- 03:51:27 Retweeted @gerrycanavan 03:18:17 denial
anger
bargaining
ad hoc pseudostatistical modeling
depression
acceptance - 04:10:50 To be clear, I don't object to processes to double check election results. Issue is people thinking it might reverse the result this time.
- 07:46:10 Retweeted @RQDammit 06:59:26 @abulsme what we talkin bout Sam? in reply to abulsme
- 07:48:28 .@RQDammit There was flurry of folks saying Clinton should ask 4 recounts in some states cause they thought there was something suspicious. in reply to RQDammit
- 07:50:03 .@RQDammit Under closer examination though, oddness they saw was easily explainable. No reason to think results not essentially accurate. in reply to abulsme
- 07:51:20 Retweeted @CNN 04:16:28 "Just keep swimming": An emotional Ellen DeGeneres held back tears as she received the #MedalofFreedom from @POTUS… https://t.co/JnYHwCGbWZ
- 07:53:48 Retweeted @RQDammit 07:52:21 @abulsme well….dey gotta try right <symbol> in reply to abulsme
- 10:49:47 Reading – Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on вЂpoliticized science’ (Oliver Milman) https://t.co/ftMPz9ElO7
- 12:28:09 Retweeted @roseveleth 12:19:23 A thing I don't understand: why is anybody trusting or hanging onto a single word Trump says? He changes his mind constantly.
- 17:44:21 My electoral college proposal: Select electors by lottery (not by election). Sequester them until the Electoral college votes in Dec.
- 17:49:22 Retweeted @io9 17:30:25 No one in all of Harry Potter has ever been stupider than Newt Scamander https://t.co/yeAIB3927U https://t.co/RLNQ9QbEe1
- 17:50:59 Retweeted @DecisionDeskHQ 17:29:38 We've reached "people who don't realize ballots cast part of printout doesn't usually match race tallies, spread around mindlessly" stage.
- 18:18:20 Reading – Trump’s Plan to Eliminate NASA Climate Research Is Ill-Informed and Dangerous (Phil Plait) https://t.co/REHHAByUHr
- 18:24:14 Reading – Liberals Are Suddenly Experts in Russian Espionage (@20committee) https://t.co/TuDAsMGnsd
- 18:29:20 Reading – Steve Bannon Isn't a Racist. He's Worse. (Kevin Drum) https://t.co/WEPDYzQQbu
- 18:30:08 Retweeted @ajjaffe 18:13:47 News: Jill Stein's going to file for a recount in WI, MI & PA if she can raise the money—will announce on FB shortly.
- 20:46:48 Retweeted @daveweigel 20:35:39 A better use of Jill Stein’s time might have been saying “hey, MI and WI and PA supporters should vote for Clinton.” Just spitballing here
- 20:48:17 Stein’s fundraiser for recounts is here by the way. Almost zero indication it would substantially change results. https://t.co/YfhvqwnkJi
- 21:00:07 Retweeted @nycsouthpaw 20:57:33 Great way to build her list https://t.co/5wLJUlWAO5
- 21:31:33 Retweeted @GongwerMichigan 21:07:19 Final unofficial margin in Michigan for Trump over Clinton: 10,704. Board of State Canvassers to vote Monday on making it official.
- 21:34:44 OK, fine, I started a chart to track how Jill Stein’s fundraising is going. Will update periodically. Google sheet: https://t.co/zvXm7Fxtpd
- 23:01:28 Chart of Jill Stein recount fundraising pace updated. https://t.co/zvXm7Fxtpd https://t.co/qo2163Mkjs
- 23:03:02 (FTR, I don’t mind a recount to check things, but think chances of it changing anything are negligible, I just like to graph. :-) )
- 23:17:55 .@MichaelSkolnik Stein recount fundraising pace chart for ya. Updating periodically. https://t.co/zvXm7Fxtpd https://t.co/vQIZC59PU9
- 23:40:56 Retweeted @RealClearNews 23:40:09 Polls are still coming out and RCP is still tracking them https://t.co/WTP3QGRuuG
- 23:42:59 .@RealClearNews No state level 2020 Presidential matchups yet? What is taking the pollsters so long?! :-) in reply to RealClearNews