- 00:28:41 Reading – Perry: A brokered convention would be a new ballgame for everyone — and I do mean everyone (Allahpundit) https://t.co/HDC2RewbHa
- 00:29:35 Reading – Donors ask GOP consulting firm to research independent presidential bid (Scott Bland) https://t.co/SE91LeLMVB
- 01:09:47 Listening to Exponent Episode 068 — Binary Backdoors https://t.co/u5sgHH5Yge
- 01:32:28 Retweeted @NateSilver538 01:26:14 Point here: a lot of professional-class Republicans might be better off opposing Trump and regrouping for 2020 than handing over the party. in reply to NateSilver538
- 01:32:42 Retweeted @NateSilver538 2016-02-26 22:47:27 Also to consider: in 2020, Hillary Clinton would be 72, gunning for her party's 4th straight term, possibly quite unpopular. Tough re-elect.
- 01:33:03 Retweeted @NateSilver538 2016-02-26 22:28:19 People are probably underrating what a shitshow the GOP convention will be, even presuming that it's not contested.
- 01:50:35 Listening to The Infinite Monkey Cage Brian and Robin's Infinite Inbox https://t.co/EV66k5HQ0u
- 15:11:59 Retweeted @NumbersMuncher 15:10:09 Is there anything the results in South Carolina tonight are going to tell us besides how depressed Bernie fans are going to be?
- 15:14:12 Reading – Whitman scorches Christie over Trump, prefers Hillary (Tom Moran) https://t.co/6pYuvw2YnM
- 18:43:57 Retweeted @FHQ 18:41:31 Mini-rant coming. I don't do this often, but I do ask that you RT to combat some misinformation floating around out there.
- 18:44:00 Retweeted @FHQ 18:41:56 There are a lot of folks who are pedaling this fiction that CO (& WY) will have unbound delegations. This is not the case. in reply to FHQ
- 18:44:03 Retweeted @FHQ 18:42:21 Yes, FHQ lists both CO & WY as "unbound*" here https://t.co/ypMH2KARiT but that [*] is just a huge caveat. in reply to FHQ
- 18:44:07 Retweeted @FHQ 18:43:02 R delegates from CO https://t.co/Aj8q6XrMXv & WY https://t.co/BfNB2hvoiM are only unbound **if** they file to run as uncommitted. in reply to FHQ
- 18:44:16 Retweeted @FHQ 18:43:35 If delegate candidates in CO & WY align with a candidate when they file to run as delegates, then they are bound to those candidates. Period in reply to FHQ
- 18:44:19 Retweeted @FHQ 18:43:56 That is how the RNC is interpreting the CO & WY rules. in reply to FHQ
- 18:44:55 Retweeted @FHQ 18:44:19 There'll be some uncommitted delegates from CO & WY. The automatic delegates, probably, but only a few of the others. Most will align/pledge in reply to FHQ
- 18:44:58 Retweeted @FHQ 18:44:45 But that is a far different story then the one making the rounds out there that all of the CO & WY delegates will be unbound. in reply to FHQ
- 19:14:21 Retweeted @FHQ 18:45:12 ND's a different story as are American Samoa, Guam & Virgin Islands. in reply to FHQ
- 19:14:26 Retweeted @FHQ 18:45:37 But even in those, there are limitations to just how unbound/unaligned the delegates really are. https://t.co/YkyHWK02VC in reply to FHQ
- 19:14:31 Retweeted @FHQ 18:46:05 End rant. in reply to FHQ
- 19:15:04 Reading – Will Conservatives Abandon Donald Trump in the General Election? (Kevin Drum) https://t.co/VGBgyAF7qW
- 19:36:19 [Abulpost] Curmudgeon's Corner: The Poorly Educated https://t.co/DM9c0gSthb
- 19:53:55 Retweeted @ScottNY71 19:52:47 @abulsme Or will he abandon them, expose himself as the moderate that he always has been and win over even more people than he loses? in reply to abulsme
- 19:54:29 .@ScottNY71 Or both. in reply to ScottNY71
- 19:56:28 Retweeted @ScottNY71 19:56:02 @abulsme This election cycle is a political scientist/reporter's dream come true. And an American citizen's nightmare. in reply to abulsme
- 19:57:58 .@ScottNY71 The polysci folks are going nuts because Trump breaks all their models. “The Party Decides”. Oops! in reply to ScottNY71
- 20:20:04 Retweeted @ScottNY71 19:59:52 @abulsme I've been enjoying the theater, but the candidate I respect & believe could accomplish the most (not even in my party!) won't win. in reply to abulsme
- 20:28:53 .@ScottNY71 You’re a Sanders guy, right? I’m sorry. :-) in reply to ScottNY71
- 20:30:33 Retweeted @ScottNY71 20:30:05 @abulsme No. And to avoid revealing too much publicly, I won't say anything more. in reply to abulsme
- 20:31:35 .@ScottNY71 Hmm. Interesting. I must have confused you with someone else. I won’t try to guess then, although that would be fun. :-) in reply to ScottNY71
- 20:57:55 Retweeted @arctictony 20:56:58 Is it too late to have Michelle Obama run?
- 21:31:33 Retweeted @CocoJr 2016-02-26 00:10:33 2016: No way will Trump win the election
2017: No way will President Trump fire all those nukes
2018: No way we're doing what those Apes say - 22:07:25 Reading – Inside the GOP Implosion and the War to Stop Trump (@JoshTPM) https://t.co/Q6G5OePkCc
- 22:11:37 Retweeted @AlecMacGillis 21:21:45 Maybe the ur Trump voter quote, from NYT in Texas: "Nationalism is the new thing, man. I just kind of want to watch the establishment burn."
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.