- 04:28:23 The only thing that could get me to watch boxing -> The Best Moments From The Romney-Holyfield Fight (Dalrymple) http://t.co/Uok5XGevCx
- 04:28:27 Retweeted @AnnDRomney 04:21:02 Loved being part of Mitt's posse tonight. #CVfightnight http://t.co/gBc89JFObV
- 14:33:05 Retweeted @jennsteele 01:20:29 @abulsme No one I know in MA is happy with the verdict. But then, no one who hates the death penalty (i.e., most of MA) could serve, right? in reply to abulsme
- 14:35:23 .@jennsteele Yup, the magic of jury selection. I’ve long thought there should be no void dire. Should be pure random, you get what you get. in reply to jennsteele
- 14:36:44 .@jennsteele & that would certainly also prohibit “death qualification”. If you can’t get a true random jury to agree, it shouldn’t happen. in reply to jennsteele
- 15:21:05 Reading – Feds say that banned researcher commandeered a plane (Kim Zetter) http://t.co/bgfotjbKgs
- 15:28:55 Reading – Why Ken Jennings’s вЂJeopardy!’ Streak Is Nearly Impossible To Break (David Goldenberg) http://t.co/YNtp5Aje0r
- 16:10:04 Retweeted @jennsteele 16:09:50 @abulsme Yes! If the sample of people doesn't want to kill you, you're in luck. If not, oh well. It makes more sense to me. in reply to abulsme
- 16:10:51 .@jennsteele Of course, I’ve argued for picking congress and the electoral college by lottery too, so you may not want to listen to me. :-) in reply to jennsteele
- 16:11:40 Retweeted @jennsteele 16:11:30 @abulsme I strongly suspect that a randomly chosen congress would be much, much better. in reply to abulsme
- 16:12:02 .@jennsteele Could hardly be worse, right? :-) in reply to jennsteele
- 16:12:58 Retweeted @jennsteele 16:12:50 @abulsme Could we just make sure to randomly pick Elizabeth Warren? Oh, wait. I've missed the point. in reply to abulsme
- 16:13:27 .@jennsteele Indeed. :-) in reply to jennsteele
- 18:28:07 Reading – A Note To Young Photographers (@toddbigphoto) http://t.co/mG9hqiblE6
- 19:54:45 Retweeted @jayrosen_nyu 19:39:50 A public service announcement for candidates who "don't do hypotheticals." Voting is a hypothetical.
- 23:17:58 Reading – Death Sentence for Boston Bomber Tsarnaev, Unsettles City He Tore Apart (Seelye/Goodnough/Bidgood) http://t.co/d4DHQC7qyx
- 23:21:25 Reading – Why do we allow troglodytes to sentence people to death? (Frederick Leatherman) http://t.co/wM4IFOjypA
- 23:27:05 Reading – A Diplomatic Victory, and Affirmation, for Putin (David Herszenhorn) http://t.co/n7YeSH0lS6
- 23:29:59 Yup. -> The media’s reaction to Seymour Hersh’s bin Laden scoop has been disgraceful (@trevortimm) http://t.co/sWmOAAaqmL
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.