This is the website of Abulsme Noibatno Itramne (also known as Sam Minter). Posts here are rare these days. For current stuff, follow me on Mastodon

Categories

Calendar

2012 Republican Delegate Count: After New Hampshire

For the second time this election season we have delegate updates. This time of course from New Hampshire. As before, I am going to concentrate here on the graph above, which is the percent of the outstanding delegates the candidate needs to get in order to wrap up the nomination. For more common charts, like total delegates and the like, go to my full 2012 Republican Delegate Count Graphs page.

For this chart, remember that DOWN is better. When a candidate gets down to zero, they have wrapped up the nomination. If they go up past 100 then they have been mathematically eliminated from winning absent delegates changing their votes. Basically, you can look at this as measuring how close they are to winning. The lower the line, the closer they are to winning.

Bottom line here is that only one candidate actually improved their overall position based on the results in New Hampshire. That candidate is of course Romney. As you can see above, his percentage needed dropped slightly. This means the bar he needs to pass in all future contests was just LOWERED a bit, so his road to the nomination is easier. Everybody else in the race, even some others who increased the percentage of delegates they have, didn’t get ENOUGH… so their road to the nomination gets harder after this, not easier.

Of course this lines up nicely with the dominant narrative at this point. This was a big success for Romney, everybody else muddles along. The standard narrative is moving rapidly toward inevitability though. This is of course based on momentum and how spin following each contest effects the next elections, etc. From a pure delegate count point of view though, we just are not there yet. Only 1.6% of the available delegates have been awarded at this point… and that is only if you count provisional estimates of delegates from Iowa (they haven’t REALLY been allocated yet). The candidates are still close enough together in delegate count, and there are still so many delegates yet to allocate, that *if* the kind of volatility in support that happened during the pre-primary season were to continue, with either Romney collapsing, or another candidate having a “surge”, or if the dynamics start to shift as candidates drop out, there is still plenty of room for non-Romneys to make a move here.

Having said that, honestly, it does still look like Romney is going to quickly run away with this unless something happens to change the dynamics of the race VERY SOON. We just can’t actually say that from the numbers yet. Right now (estimates via The Green Papers) we have Romney with 13 delegates, followed by Paul 9, Santorum 6, Gingrich 4, Perry 3 and Huntsman 2. With 2249 more delegates yet to be determined. So a long way to go yet.

Given however that as of today for the first time, we actually have a delegate leader in the Republican campaign, I’ve started to put together my General Election Electoral College models based on state by state polling assuming we are going to end up with Obama vs Romney. Look for those to debut here before the end of the month.

@abulsme Updates from 2012-01-10 (UTC)

Curmudgeon’s Corner: 2011-2012 Prediction Show, Part 2

In the latest Curmudgeon’s Corner…

Sam and Ivan talk about:

  • Iowa / New Hampshire / South Carolina
  • 2012 Economic Predictions
  • 2012 Tech Predictions and Other Predictions

Just click to listen now:

[wpaudio url=”http://www.abulsme.com/CurmudgeonsCorner/cc20120108.mp3″ text=”Recorded 8 Jan 2012″]

or

1-Click Subscribe in iTunes

View Podcast in iTunes

View XML Feed

@abulsme Updates from 2012-01-09 (UTC)

@abulsme Updates from 2012-01-08 (UTC)

Must Read: The Coming War on General Computation

Here is another “you really should read this” article. Well, strictly speaking, it is a transcript of a video. I saw links to the video soon after it was new, but I didn’t have time to watch the video (almost an hour) and it took me awhile to even have time to read the transcript… :-)

The Coming War on General Computation
(Presented at 28C3 by Cory Doctorow, Transcribed by Joshua Wise)

It’s not that regulators don’t understand information technology, because it should be possible to be a non-expert and still make a good law! M.P.s and Congressmen and so on are elected to represent districts and people, not disciplines and issues. We don’t have a Member of Parliament for biochemistry, and we don’t have a Senator from the great state of urban planning, and we don’t have an M.E.P. from child welfare. (But perhaps we should.) And yet those people who are experts in policy and politics, not technical disciplines, nevertheless, often do manage to pass good rules that make sense, and that’s because government relies on heuristics – rules of thumbs about how to balance expert input from different sides of an issue.

But information technology confounds these heuristics – it kicks the crap out of them – in one important way, and this is it. One important test of whether or not a regulation is fit for a purpose is first, of course, whether it will work, but second of all, whether or not in the course of doing its work, it will have lots of effects on everything else. If I wanted Congress to write, or Parliament to write, or the E.U. to regulate a wheel, it’s unlikely I’d succeed. If I turned up and said “well, everyone knows that wheels are good and right, but have you noticed that every single bank robber has four wheels on his car when he drives away from the bank robbery? Can’t we do something about this?”, the answer would of course be “no”. Because we don’t know how to make a wheel that is still generally useful for legitimate wheel applications but useless to bad guys. And we can all see that the general benefits of wheels are so profound that we’d be foolish to risk them in a foolish errand to stop bank robberies by changing wheels. Even if there were an /epidemic/ of bank robberies, even if society were on the verge of collapse thanks to bank robberies, no-one would think that wheels were the right place to start solving our problems.

Or, for those that prefer, the original video is below.

@abulsme Updates from 2012-01-07 (UTC)

  • Reading – Mayor Bloomberg Will Learn How To Write Code In 2012 (Carl Franzen) http://t.co/KFkp8USX #
  • Reading – Happy Friday! Here's a Video of a Lion Trying to Eat a Small Child (Megan Seling) http://t.co/KY1fWvbu #

@abulsme Updates from 2012-01-06 (UTC)

@abulsme Updates from 2012-01-05 (UTC)

@abulsme Updates from 2012-01-04 (UTC)

  • RT @kdrum: Update: How Iowa Really Works http://t.co/xZSZbeFU #
  • RT @joshtpm: Wow. Sounds like Perry’s pulling out. Didn’t say explicitly. But in election speak pretty clear. #
  • RT @fivethirtyeight: What if there’s LITERALLY a tie? #
  • RT @thinkprogress: Santorum up by 5 VOTES with 99% reporting. #
  • RT @HuffPostHill: In other news, Herman Cain got 58 votes. #
  • RT @thinkprogress: This page, which has been accurate all night, has Santorum up 34 votes with 100% reporting http://t.co/9viDUfDa #
  • RT @KenJennings Damn, if Perry drops out there is only one deeply closeted bigot named Rick left int he GOP field. So much for a deep bench. #
  • RT @fivethirtyeight: Google and CNN now agreed: Santorum 29,935, Romney 29,916, 5 precincts left” #
  • Such suspense! :-) RT @fivethirtyeight: Now 2 precincts left, Santorum up 18, according to both Google and CNN. #
  • RT @fivethirtyeight: One of the outstanding precincts is something called “Keokuk – Sigourney Plank Van Buren” #
  • Reading – Obama Says Bill Breaks with Our Values, Signs It Anyway (Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic) http://t.co/zi38E8V5 #
  • This is just awsome! ONE VOTE!! RT @thinkprogress: 2 precincts out, but Romney mysteriously goes up by 1 vote. http://t.co/9viDUfDa #acorn
  • Reading – White House Denies CIA Teleported Obama to Mars (Spencer Ackerman, Wired) http://is.gd/AacZ69
  • RT @fivethirtyeight: The Google spreadsheet has more votes counted than CNN and has Santorum up by 4. 29,968 to 29,964.
  • via @fivethirtyeight RT @cbsjancrawford: Romney team says he won by 14 votes. Just talked to state party officials.
  • Reading – Inside a Toddler’s Brain (Neato Bambino)http://is.gd/x5Z7S6
  • Finally official! RT @BreakingNews: Mitt Romney wins Iowa caucuses by 8 votes over Rick Santorum. – Iowa GOP chair
  • Via @fivethirtyeight RT @thecaucus: Iowa G.O.P. chairman says Romney has won with 30,015 votes to Santorum’s 30,007.
  • via @fivethirtyeight MT @RobertMackey: That means Romney got 6 votes less in these Iowa caucuses than in 2008.
  • Really gotta find tape of that interview Ivan did on @wrct883 with Santorum back around 1992ish.
  • Reading – Tied Iowa vote produces epic CNN night (Brendan Loy)http://is.gd/ZLkY0K – I was watching too. It was Epic! :-)
  • Reading – What We Learned From the Iowa Caucuses (Molly Ball, The Atlantic) http://is.gd/AmJStl
  • MT @JamieNBCNews: Bachmann has apparently cancelled her South Carolina trip; her campaign has called a press conference at 10amCT.
  • RT @jbplainblog: Delegates and the Ron Paul Strategy: He has a strategy to maximize delegates. It won’t matter.http://ow.ly/8hPSZ
  • RT @prwerdel: Today our thoughts are with all Americans Googling Rick Santorum’s name for the first time.